Text published at my blog around middle last September (2016), and of course without any answers until now. This is a proof of the criminal protection and criminal complicity between European politician’s with functions in European institution’s at high level.
REMEMBERING MY ACCUSATION AGAINST MR JUNKER, PRESIDENT OF EC
Fallowing my last text on this line, Junker/Durão, recent news, must then I share with all, the next logical deduction concerning the sequence of images statements act by him with Durão Barroso.
Before Mr Junker clapping hands to Mr Durão Barroso, he also appeared on a Portuguese cover of a newspaper saying that in his opinion Mr Durão was a Lobbyist man.
Lobbyist is a very strange and sometimes undefined term, because in essence speaks about reunion, or gathering mans, namely by good causes that we citizens hope to promote good actions within the law.
The first question that arise, his them, what translate to us all, this two-step sequence of Mr Junker concerning Mr Durão?
An undefined term, that normally goes both sides, because if I remember well, exists some acts that can be considered lobbyism that are according the laws also crimes.
Them a joint photo, where Durão seems crying after a public speech and Mr Junker by side clapping hands, not forgetting that the first step of Mr Junker actual sequence, was a very strange statement just after one more earth shake.
Is this applause of Junker concerning a public confession of Durão, and if so, relative to what subject, his first statement, or even the eventual responsibility of Durão on this earth shake in Italy?
Not knowing also because was not clear and define on the news, it seems that the sum is an act from Mr Junker to pass a sponge on the back of Mr Durão.
He raise a question with a term that is undefined, that allow Durão, eventually to contradict by telling a lie, and then he clap hands to him, like suggesting to us, that after all, Durão is innocent.
But if the question raised by Mr Junker in his first appearance was if Durão was guilty of some bad behaviour, undefined, that eventually can be consider crime, what is in reality the crime that he charge him first?
Must I remember all and Mr Junker, that as proven, before his statement concerning Durão, at the systematic absence of answers in the last more than 10 years concerning many crimes, including the robber of my son, if alive, I had remember in my actual manuscript published at SEAMATTERS.blogspot.pt, one of my accusations delivered to European Criminal Court some years ago against Durão, where I charge him, not in an undefined way of lobbyism, but as responsible of a crime against the Portuguese republic and the state of law; of state infiltration and corruption by having nominate a few thousand peoples in the three only months that we was PM of Portugal before assuming the function of EC Presidency,
And I still do not have any answers from the courts neither at European level, nor the Portuguese’s ones, that are also aware of his crime and by the absence of answer also can be by the law considered accomplices.
Sexta-feira, Setembro 16, 2016
http://www.dn.pt/portugal/interior/funcionarios-europeus-porfavornaonosconfundam-com-o-senhor-barroso-5388374.html
Upper link is a reference to news at online DN concerning what seems a statement of European institutions workers that in this undefined context, had the need to put them away from Durão Barroso, and must I remember that also in this sequence and before, also appears, after I had again remember some aspects of my criminal accusations against him without answer until now, some of them delivered to European criminal court, one, saying that a Lady that is daughter of one of the European founders, had suite him.
Doze anos para o entender.
TERÇA-feira, SETEMBRO 20, 2016
ABOUT SOME NEWS?
EUROPEAN NEWS OR ACCOUNTS IN BLOOD?
A very strange sequence of photo statements
I look the one under, previous post, (in this alignment the one above) and the content on the link, where the commission’s workers put them apart from the man that was the president, and I ask, what is the real reason for the need of this statement just now.
I see by his side, Junker, clapping hand, and I have a doubt about the expression of Durão, what is really expressing in emotional terms if he have a heart.
The hand and finger on the eye is due to what?
Was he crying and had made a public confession and for this reason Junker was clapping him?
Or is one more line on the constant lecher crimes on sexual live if one, and the recent complex sub line of fishing, as also I had comment recently?
Some sperm jump for his eye in the finishing?
(I’m referring the lecher crime on sexuality that as all now is going on)
Also I have another doubt, because this is one of the recurrent strategies of information’s manipulation, or mis-information to create layers of deceiving, because in the online article there no reference for instance to the date or event or the place of the photo.
And a very strange statement, also just before, I had published a video comment remembering the crimes on Portuguese state infiltration, that are by law crimes against republic made by Durão in the three and only months that he was PM here before assuming function as EC commission president.
He had done a criminal innovation, he had nominated in the beginning, normally all the parties do the same just at the end of power, but the number of nominees is according the public information the same, a few thousands.As all know this accusation is integrate part of my accusations delivered to Curia some years ago that still without answers others then apparently archiving.
Must then in this square consider the statement of Junker in this point a kind of replay to me?
And then I see him after clapping Durão?
Is this a virtual justice without any consequences as usual, neither political, nor judicial?
Before as also comment, was another photo around the earth shake on Amatrice, where Junker stated with a very strange expression, “that the worst invention of man whore the frontiers”, this at the same time that I’m trying to rebuild this system and it protection at this statement time, and Amatrice earth shake, from more than two weeks, including trying to close doors or frontiers from the terrorists attacks that are the black daily bread every day at all the level of modern live, and of course that are others possible meta sense on this saying.
But bottom line, where is the responsibility account, and what happened as retaliation in Spain with the train accident, if an accident.
Before in a Portuguese newspaper a photo of Durão as head of Sachs and Goldman, a promotion if I had understood well.
Also some days ago, some Portuguese parliamentary on the TV had state that the commission will black mail Portugal, and this is the strange reality non sense of European politics today’s and seems that no one remember that if someone state an action of blackmail, this is considered a crime and must be answer in this terms.These themes, Amatraci and Spain are approached by hand write mode on my last published extract at my blog seamatters.blogspot.pt.
As also I explain again, they still have a crime of access impeachment on the referred blog, which seems even fit on one part of the public attorney saying, to protect the good name and honour, of criminals, must I sum.
I’m again publishing some extracts of my criminal accusation against Cavaco Silva during his presidency of the Portuguese Republic and was all notice, these terrorists had change on line during the upload the sequence of the scan pages of my document of my accusation delivered long time ago to the European Criminal Court.
Must I remember to all, that Durão Barroso is one of the dauphins of Cavaco Silva, and of course they had work together at Portuguese government and is fair to say that they act together in this crime of international conspiracy, in the robber of my son and my slavery.
Revised at 06 10 2017
Paulo forte
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário